Question:
Who was MARK in the NT ?
2007-05-06 18:05:47 UTC
How can he write a book of Mark if he was not an eye witness to all these event took place in jesus time? Like when Jesus rose the dead, or conversation with GOD at the mountain, etc...how does he know all these? and why?
Fifteen answers:
CaTcHmEiFuCaN
2007-05-06 18:11:24 UTC
The book of Mark was written by the hand of Mark at the request of Peter. More accurately Mark is the gospel account as told by the disciple Peter.
?
2007-05-06 18:12:23 UTC
Mark, not an apostle himself, was an associate of the apostle Paul for a short time, but the gospel bearing his name is (to some minds) based on the preaching of Peter. It's generally assumed to have been the first gospel written, coming in right before Matthew at about 65 AD.



A number of people in the New Testament — not only Acts but also in the Pauline letters — are named Mark and anyone of them could potentially have been the author behind this gospel. Tradition has it that the Gospel According to Mark was written down by Mark, a companion of Peter, who simply recorded what Peter preached in Rome (1 Peter 5:13) and this person was, in turn, identified with “John Mark” in Acts (12:12,25; 13:5-13; 15:37-39) as well as the “Mark” in Philemon 24, Colossians 4:10, and 2 Timothy 4:1.
2007-05-06 18:16:30 UTC
John Mark was an eye witness.



He was a teenager or younger man at the time of Jesus public ministry and worked closely with Peter.



Since Peter was a dumb fisherman, who most likely could not read or write, Mark functioned as his scribe or secretary.



Which is why occationally the Gospel of Mark is sometimes called the Gospel of St. Peter.



We also know from the book of Acts, that John Mark went on various Missionary Journeys. And he went home early from one trip.



Pastor Art
Theban
2007-05-06 18:22:20 UTC
Or for that matter, Luke, the physican who "also" was not around at the time Jesus was on earth. Both Mark and Luke were "disciples," close to the Apostle Paul, who also did not happen to be around when Jesus was on earth. These persons were like our modern day missionaries spreading the words taught by Jesus as told to them by the rest of the 11 apostles who "were" with Jesus. If you look closely, some of these persons "copied" from each other possibly fearing that written materials would be destroyed by non-believers........
realchurchhistorian
2007-05-06 18:19:29 UTC
John Mark is the Mark of the Gospel of Mark.



His was the house Peter came to when the Angel let him out of prison.



He was the one who turned back in cowardice on Paul & Barnabus' Missionary Team.



He worked with Peter in Babylon amongst the Jewish settlements established in the old Babylonian Empire. His writings in the Gospel of Mark are actually Peter's recollections.



Peter's Gospel (The Gospel of Mark) was very popular with the people to whom Peter's first handwritten letter was addressed to.
Silver
2007-05-06 18:17:53 UTC
from peter - he was an associate of peter, and evidently his spiritual son.. from peter he received first-hand information of the events and teachings of the lord, and preserved the information in written form.



it is generally agreed that mark is the john mark of the new testament..mark joined paul and barnabas on their first missionary journey, but not on the second because of a strong disagreement between the two men [in acts 15:37-38]. however, near the end of paul’s life he called for mark to be with him
RickySTT, EAC
2007-05-06 18:20:44 UTC
Traditionally, Simon Peter's interpreter John Mark.



In reality, nobody knows. The book of Mark is unsigned, but whoever wrote it was unfamiliar with Jewish customs and Palestinian geography. He could not have known Peter, or have been an eyewitness, or even have lived in Palestine.
John 1:1
2007-05-06 18:16:03 UTC
Mark the Evangelist (מרקוס, Greek: Μάρκος) (1st century) is traditionally believed to be the author of the Gospel of Mark and a companion of Peter. He also accompanied Paul and Barnabas in Paul's first journey. After a sharp dispute, Barnabas separated from Paul, taking Mark to Cyprus (Acts 15:36-40). Later Paul calls upon the services of Mark, the kinsman of Barnabas, and Mark is named as Paul's fellow worker. He is also believed to be the first patriarch of Alexandria by both the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Coptic Orthodox Church, and thus the founder of Christianity in Africa. His evangelistic symbol is the winged lion.



In Egypt, Mark the Evangelist is said to have performed many miracles, and established a church there, appointing a bishop (Anianus of Alexandria), three priests, and seven deacons.



The martyrdom of Saint Mark When Mark returned to Alexandria, the people there are said to have resented his efforts to turn them away from the worship of their traditional Egyptian gods. In AD 67 they killed him, and tried to burn his body. Afterwards, the Christians in Alexandria removed his unburned body from the ashes, wrapped it and then buried it in the north easterly part of the church they had built.
n_007pen
2007-05-06 18:16:18 UTC
Mark the evangelist; "John whose surname was Mark" (Acts 12:12,25). Mark (Marcus, Colossians 4:10, etc.) was his Roman name, which gradually came to supersede his Jewish name John.



He is called John in Acts 13:5,13, and Mark in 15:39,2Tim 4:11,
2007-05-06 18:57:15 UTC
Mark was a disciple of Peter.

Peter influenced him a lot and he was like a son to him.

As you can see, in the book of Mark, it moves fast when you read it, hardly details. Peter was a great influence on Mark.

Peace.....
matowakan58
2007-05-06 18:30:58 UTC
mark whose real name was john mark follower of jesus and then known as apostle mark/

author of the gospel of Mark.there is no bibical evidence he only penned peters account but it is accepted since he was companion to peter they collaborated on the account.look here for a full story on mark.http://orthodoxwiki.org/Apostle_Mark
2007-05-06 18:11:35 UTC
Mark was Jesus' Disciple he was an eye witness to all the events that happend during Jesus' time....It's all there...read it for yourself
Stormilutionist Chasealogist
2007-05-06 18:12:23 UTC
He heard from someone who heard it from someone who heard it from someone else...and that is how urban legends get started...it goes on and on and on....



Hey girl above me...no he wasn't...educate yourself...the gospels weren't written until about 65-70 AD...30-40 years AFTER Jesus was supposedly crucified....
voice_of_reason
2007-05-06 18:13:49 UTC
a character made up by Josephus



lol



Mother's

Against

Returning

Karasts (christs)
Hyzakyt
2007-05-06 18:14:50 UTC
Mark



The evangelist; "John whose surname was Mark" (Acts 12:12, 25). Mark (Marcus, (Col 4:10)) was his Roman name, which gradually came to supersede his Jewish name John. He is called John in Acts 13:5, 13, and Mark in Mark 15:39; 2Ti 4, etc.







He was the son of Mary, a woman apparently of some means and influence, and was probably born in Jerusalem, where his mother resided (Acts 12:12). Of his father we know nothing. He was cousin of Barnabas (Col 4:10). It was in his mother's house that Peter found "many gathered together praying" when he was released from prison; and it is probable that it was here that he was converted by Peter, who calls him his "son" (1Pe 5:13). It is probable that the "young man" spoken of in Mark 14:51, 52 was Mark himself. He is first mentioned in Acts 12:25. He went with Paul and Barnabas on their first journey (about A.D. 47) as their "minister," but from some cause turned back when they reached Perga in Pamphylia (Acts 12:25; Acts 13:13). Three years afterwards a "sharp contention" arose between Paul and Barnabas (Acts 15:36-40), because Paul would not take Mark with him. He, however, was evidently at length reconciled to the apostle, for he was with him in his first imprisonment at Rome (Col 4:10; Phm 1:24). At a later period he was with Peter in Babylon (1Pe 5:13), then, and for some centuries afterwards, one of the chief seats of Jewish learning; and he was with Timothy in Ephesus when Paul wrote him during his second imprisonment (2Ti 4:11). He then disappears from view.





MARK, JOHN



mark, John (Greek [Ioannes]) represents his Jewish, Mark (Greek [Markos]) his Roman name. Why the latter was assumed we do not know.







1. Name and Family:



Perhaps the aorist participle in Acts 12:25 may be intended to intimate that it dated from the time when, in company with Barnabas and Saul, he turned to service in the great Gentilecity of Antioch. Possibly it was the badge of Roman citizenship, as in the case of Paul. The standing of the family would be quite consistent with such a supposition.







His mother's name was Mary (Acts 12:12). The home is spoken of as hers. The father was probably dead. The description of the house (with its large room and porch) and the mention of the Greek slave, suggest a family of wealth. They were probably among the many zealous Jews who, having become rich in the great world outside, retired to Jerusalem, the center of their nation and faith. Mark was "cousin" to Barnabas of Cyprus (Col 4:10) who also seems to have been a man of means (Acts 4:36). Possibly Cyprus was also Mark's former home.







2. His History as Known from the New Testament:



When first mentioned, Mark and his mother are already Christians (44 AD). He had been converted through Peter's personal influence (1Pet 5:13) and had already won a large place in the esteem of the brethren, as is shown by his being chosen to accompany Barnabas and Saul to Antioch, a little later. The home was a resort for Christians, so that Mark had every opportunity to become acquainted with other leaders such as James and John, and James the brother of the Lord. It was perhaps from the latter James that he learned the incident of Mk 3:21 which Peter would be less likely to mention.







His kinship with Barnabas, knowledge of Christian history and teaching, and proved efficiency account for his being taken along on the first missionary journey as "minister" (Greek [huperetes]) to Barnabas and Saul (Acts 13:5). Just what that term implies is not clear. Chase (HDB) conjectures the meaning to be that he had been Greek [huperetes], "attendant" or Greek [chazzan] in the synagogue (compare Lk 4:20), and was known as such an official. Wright (English translation, February, 1910) suggests that he was to render in newly founded churches a teaching service similar to that of the synagogue Greek [chazzan]. Hackett thought that the kai of this verse implies that he was to be doing the same kind of work as Barnabas and Saul and so to be their "helper" in preaching and teaching. The more common view has been (Meyer, Swete, et al.) that he was to perform "personal service not evangelistic," "official service but not of the menial kind" -- to be a sort of business agent. The view that he was to be a teacher, a catechist for converts, seems to fit best all the facts.







Why did he turn back from the work (Acts 13:13)? Not because of homesickness, or anxiety for his mother's safety, or home duties, or the desire to rejoin Peter, or fear of the perils incident to the journey, but rather because he objected to the offer of salvation to the Gentiles on condition of faith alone. There are hints that Mark's family, like Paul's, were Hebrews of the Hebrews, and it is not without significance that in both verses (Acts 13:5, 13) he is given only his Hebrew name. The terms of Paul's remonstrance are very strong (Acts 15:38), and we know that nothing stirred Paul's feelings more deeply than this very question. The explanation of it all may be found in what happened at Paphos when the Roman Sergius Paulus became a believer. At that time Paul (the change of name is here noted by Luke) stepped to the front, and henceforth, with the exception of Lk 15:12, 25, where naturally enough the old order is maintained, Luke speaks of Paul and Barnabas, not Barnabas and Saul. We must remember that, at that time, Paul stood almost alone in his conviction. Barnabas, even later than that, had misgivings (Gal 2:13). Perhaps, too, Mark was less able than Barnabas himself to see the latter take second place.







We hear nothing further of Mark until the beginning of the second missionary journey 2 years later, when Paul's unwillingness to take him with them led to the rupture between Paul and Barnabas and to the mission of Barnabas and Mark to Cyprus (Acts 15:39). He is here called Mark, and in that quiet way Luke may indicate his own conviction that Mark's mind had changed on the great question, as indeed his willingness to accompany Paul might suggest. He had learned from the discussions in the council at Jerusalem and from subsequent events at Antioch.







About 11 years elapse before we hear of him again (Col 4:10f; Philem 1:24). He is at Rome with Paul. The breach is healed. He is now one of the faithful few among Jewish Christians who stand by Paul. He is Paul's honored "fellowworker" and a great "comfort" to him.







The Colossian passage may imply a contemplated visit by Mark to Asia Minor. It may be that it was carried out, that he met Peter and went with him to Babylon. In 1Pet 5:13 the apostle sends Mark's greeting along with that of the church in Babylon. Thence Mark returns to Asia Minor, and in 2Tim 4:11 Paul asks Timothy, who is at Ephesus, to come to him, pick up Mark by the way, and bring him along. In that connection Paul pays Mark his final tribute; he is "useful for ministering" (Greek [euchrestos eis diakonian]), so useful that his ministry is a joy to the veteran's heart.







3. His History as Known from Other Sources:



The most important and reliable tradition is that he was the close attendant and interpreter of Peter, and has given us in the Gospel that bears his name account of Peter's teaching. For that comradeship the New Testament facts furnish a basis, and the gaps in the New Testament history leave plenty of room. An examination of the tradition will be found in MARK, THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO (which see).







Other traditions add but little that is reliable. It is said that Mark had been a priest, and that after becoming a Christian he amputated a finger to disqualify himself for that service. Hence, the nickname Greek [kolobo-daktulos], which, however, is sometimes otherwise explained. He is represented as having remained in Cyprus until after the death of Barnabas (who was living in 57 AD according to 1Cor 9:5f) and then to have gone to Alexandria, founded the church there, become its first bishop and there died (or was marthyred) in the 8th year of Nero (62-63). They add that in 815 AD Venetian soldiers stole his remains from Alexandria and placed them under the church of Mark at Venice.







LITERATURE.



Chase, HDB, III, 245ff; Rae, DCG, II, 119 f; Harnack, Encyclopedia Brit; Zahn, Introduction to the New Testament, II, 427-56; Lindsay, Salmond, Morison and Swete in their Comms.







Definition Written By: J. H. Farmer


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...