Greetings,
It is impossible for Jesus to be the Alpha and Omega. The Alpha and Omega is explicitly called Almighty. Yet, Jesus is explicitly placed lower than Almighty God at every point of his existence. Jesus always has a God over him and is subject Almighty God (Jn.14:28; 20:17; Mk.13:32; 1Cor.15:27,28; Rev. 3:12,14).
Trinitarians attempt to use Rev. 22:12-13 to prove that Jesus is the Alpha and Omega. To do this they must ignore the context and explicit statements of Revelation and the Bible as a whole.
"Alpha and Omega" is used as a title three times in Revelation (1:8; 21:6; 22:13). Rev.1:11 of the KJV is a spurious addition.
Following are several of the many contextual reasons for why the title Alpha and Omega cannot be referring to Jesus.
First, in the context of 1:8, Jesus is explicitly excluded grammatically from being the "Alpha and Omega." In verses 4,5 we have greetings from three entities: "The One Who Is, Was, and Is Coming" AND "The Seven Spirits" AND "Jesus Christ." The individual given the title "The One Who Is and Was and Is Coming" is clearly identified as the "Alphaand Omega," the "Almighty," and "Lord God." Incontestably, the Alpha and Omegais grammatically differentiated from both Jesus Christ and from the "seven spirits." Therefore, it is impossible for Jesus to be the one addressed in 1:8 as the "Alpha and Omega."
Secondly, Revelation specifically identifies the "One Seated on the Throne" as the "Alpha and Omega" (21:5,6), yet in chapters four and five Jesus is shown to be ontologically separated from the One "on the throne". Because first he is shown receiving a scroll from the enthroned Alpha and Omega and secondly it is clear that grammatically he is consistently differentiated from the One on the throne: 1:4; 4:2,8; 5:1,5-7,13; 6:16; 7:10.
Therefore, grammatically and contextually, the first two evidences clearly prove that it is impossible for Jesus to be the Alpha and Omega. Yet, there are seven more clues important to identifying the Alpha and Omega. Here are only three more:
Third, the "Alpha and Omega" is explicitly classed as "Almighty," yet in all nine occurrences of the word Almighty Jesus is contextually--ontologically and grammatically--excluded from being the One called Almighty! (1:8; 4:8; 11:17; 15:3; 16:7,14; 19:6,15; 21:22).
Fourth, closely related to number three, the Alpha and Omega is identified as being God over Jesus in 1:6. Similarly, Rev.5:12 presents Jesus as ontologically less than Almighty since he has to "receive power and wisdom" from the Alpha and Omega on the throne, making Jesus separate and inferior to the Alpha and Omega. Further, in 1:1 and 2:26,27 Jesus receives knowledge and power from his God and Father.
Therefore, it is impossible for Jesus to be the Almighty Alpha and Omega since Jesus himself expresses his inferiority to the Alpha and Omega by declaring six times that he has a God (Rev.1:6; 3:2,12 NIV, ASV, RSV, NWT).
Let us examine the final and most contested occurrence of the title Alpha and Omega: Re 22:12-13.
Most Trinitarians interpret this occurrence as being the words of Christ identifying himself as the Alpha and Omega. Is there sound evidence for this interpretation? Is it exegesis or eisegesis?
Trinitarians claim that the speaker of Rev. 22:12-16 is Jesus Christ because in verse 16 Jesus identifies himself as speaking.
However, this conclusion is based on presupposition and not on evidence. When Jesus identifies himself in verse 16 it does not mean that the words prior to this are also his words. Rather, the scriptural evidence shows that when someone says "I so-and-so..." they are introducing themselves as a new speaker. For example, in Revelation there are two other occurrences of the first person singular "I" followed by a personal identification: Rev. 1:9 and 22:8. In both cases this grammatical marker introduces a new speaker, never the same speaker continuing!
For instance, in 1:8 "the Alpha and the Omega" is speaking, yet in the next verse, using the same syntax as in 22:16, John introduces himself as a new speaker. Obviously, it would be ridiculous to claim that this means John is "the Alpha and the Omega" of the previous verse! If we were to accept the logic of Trinitarians, we would have to conclude that John was the Almighty Alpha and Omega, since 1:9 would be a continuation of 1:8!
The same thing occurs at Rev 22:7. Would anyone insist that John was Almighty God because of John's use of the same syntax as Jesus in 22:16.
Obviously, the grammatical evidence proves that both Jesus and John were introducing themselves as new speakers.
Exegetically, there can only be one conclusion logically drawn from the evidence. Since Jesus is excluded in every single reference to the Alpha and the Omega and His unique titles, it would be an extremely doubtful conclusion to identify Jesus as the Alpha and Omega in the single reference where the owner of the title is not specifically differentiated from Jesus! The only support for identifying Jesus as the Alpha and Omega is personal theology; eisegesis not exegesis!
Though I've only presented a quarter of the evidence, it is still overwhelming evidence that Jesus is specifically excluded from receiving the title Alpha Omega anywhere in Revelation and that the title refers exclusively to Jehovah, the only Almighty God (Ps.83:18; Jn.17:3).
Yours,
BAR-ANERGES