Mormons: What do you think of "WHITED SEPULCHERS: THE HIDDEN LANGUAGE OF THE MORMON TEMPLE"?
anonymous
2014-07-01 09:06:11 UTC
it's a book by William Schnoebelen
Eight answers:
phrog
2014-07-01 10:52:00 UTC
lol...you mean bill the EX - satanic priest, catholic priest (at least in study), witch, 90 degree freemason, vampire, former illuminati member, and whatever else schnoebelen?
yea. I don't need to read that again. he doesn't get much right in there about ANYTHING...let alone the LDS.
rac
2014-07-01 19:58:31 UTC
I haven't read it and don't intend to do so. However, the "whited sepulchers" refers to hypocrites in the Bible, the Pharisees Saducees, Scribes, lawyers and judges who were supposed to be watching over Israel and keeping them in line with the teachings from God but were instead breaking most of the laws in their own lives and leading Israel astray. They pretend to be holy or "white" on the outside but inside they are corrupt, full of dead works, being "sepulchers" in spirit.
When trying to apply that to modern times, there are plenty of religious leaders who follow in that pattern, being outward examples but inward hypocrites. Are there some bad leaders in the LDS faith? Sure, but they are certainly the exception, not the rule. I submit that other faiths are at least equally full of whited sepulchers.
Neerp
2014-07-01 16:45:14 UTC
I used to have one of the largest anti-Mormon book collections. But I got tired of the same old thing over and over again. No one can seem to come up with anything new, and they almost never get it right when they try to tell you what we believe. And anyone that references Ed Decker does not have a single ounce of credibility or integrity.
It's another boring whine whine whine book about Mormonism that just can't seem to get it right.
anonymous
2014-07-02 00:34:28 UTC
I haven't read it, and based on the other answers here I'm glad that I haven't.
Ed Decker as a source? That's pretty pathetic.
Jinja Snaps
2014-07-01 12:44:50 UTC
it was a stupid as it could be. it got nothing right and so much wrong it couldn't be named...but then they were using ed decker as a "source" so that explains a lot.
?
2014-07-01 09:20:30 UTC
I don't need to read it, having gone through the ridiculous, masonic-inspired rituals myself hundreds of times.
(ex-mormon)
?
2014-07-01 09:07:21 UTC
Haven't read it.
mormon_4_jesus
2014-07-02 11:56:10 UTC
Schnoebelen is a quack.
ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.