Question:
Why is it wrong for a Catholic to believe in evolution? 10 points best answer?
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Why is it wrong for a Catholic to believe in evolution? 10 points best answer?
Nineteen answers:
?
2012-08-19 15:59:49 UTC
I'm Catholic and I accepted evolution long before the Vatican did. Because I looked at genesis as metaphorically, and a lot of advancements in science would suggest that too. Not to mention that everyone back in those days wouldn't have understood string theory and geneitics.



Besides, I think evolution is a fascinating tool that God uses in his creation.
2012-08-19 15:24:46 UTC
Most Christians believe in evolution. It is a minority yet vocal protestant and non denominational born again minority that rejects evolution since they have this stupid idea that the Bible is the LITERAL word of God, like how Muslims think the Qur'an is the LITERAL word of God.



They have no clue as to the origins of the Bible or that the early church fathers didnt even recognize the Gensis creation story as historical.



This stupid idea of rejecting science and beleiving the Bible was literal was one of the reasons I ended up leaving Christianity and "reverting" to Islam before becoming an atheist. It was only when i really studied Christianity that I discovered how compatible Christianity is with science but only under the Catholic church.



Protestantism is the biggest reason so many people turn to islam and atheism. Protestantism makes no sense.
mo in the middle
2012-08-19 15:18:52 UTC
It's not. One thing I have to give Catholics, ever since that unfortunate incident with Galileo, they seem to be much more accepting of scientific advances than other Christian religions.
?
2012-08-19 15:18:06 UTC
Catholics can accept evolution because the pope does.



'Pope John Paul II revisited the question of evolution in a 1996 a message to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. Unlike Pius XII, John Paul is broadly read, and embraces science and reason. He won the respect of many scientists in 1993, when in April 1993 he formally acquitted Galileo, 360 years after his indictment, of heretical support for Copernicus’s heliocentrism. The pontiff began his statement with the hope that “we will all be able to profit from the fruitfulness of a trustful dialogue between the Church and science.” Evolution, he said, is “an essential subject which deeply interests the Church.” He recognized that science and Scripture sometimes have “apparent contradictions,” but said that when this is the case, a “solution” must be found because “truth cannot contradict truth.” The Pope pointed to the Church’s coming to terms with Galileo’s discoveries concerning the nature of the solar system as an example of how science might inspire the Church to seek a new and “correct interpretation of the inspired word.”



When the pope came to the subject of the scientific merits of evolution, it soon became clear how much things had changed in the nearly since the Vatican last addressed the issue. John Paul said:



Today, almost half a century after publication of the encyclical, new knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than a hypothesis. It is indeed remarkable that this theory has been progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of discoveries in various fields of knowledge. The convergence, neither sought nor fabricated, of the results of work that was conducted independently is in itself a significant argument in favor of the theory.



Evolution, a doctrine that Pius XII only acknowledged as an unfortunate possibility, John Paul accepts forty-six years later “as an effectively proven fact.” (ROA, 82)'

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/vaticanview.html
2012-08-19 15:20:26 UTC
When I was Roman Catholic, I believed, and still believe, in evolution. Nothing is wrong with it.

I felt more advanced than any other Christian because I was fair. Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox are the only true church of Christ. Evolution is a fact, so it's very dumb to say otherwise.

Ignore others that can't see the truth.
?
2012-08-19 15:19:27 UTC
Because the Pope does. So do most bishops, cardinals, and even priests.
bardisa
2016-08-01 12:20:40 UTC
As others have already implied, faith and evolution are usually not mutually exotic. The Catholic Church accepts evolution, identical to they now receive that the Earth revolves around the sun - some persons had been burned at the stake for claiming that one a number of hundred years ago. Most mainstream religions do likewise. The bastion of creationism is in the the U.S. And the fundamentalist Christian religions. For this reason the USA is falling behind in science schooling, seeing that they disrupt and drive compromise onto the science curriculum in schools. Sure, i can sit here and suppose that I was firstly some other organism, seeing that it is the handiest thing which is smart to me. Why else would I share DNA with a chimpanzee, if I wasn't related? Why will have to my DNA be more just like a gorilla than to a hummingbird, if I wasn't extra carefully related to the Gorilla? If you can get earlier the offence you suppose at being a branch of the ape loved ones, you may see this as good. You say that there are too many holes in Evolution. The place? Are these gaps just portions of evolution that you do not take delivery of? Or are they real missing areas of abilities? Given that evolutionary idea has been supported with the aid of every branch of science on the grounds that Darwin proposed his theory, even sciences which came after him, chiefly Genetics, which not best supported evolution, however explained how it happened all the way down to the molecular stage. Where are the gaps? There are no problems with evolution, only mild enhancements to how the theory works, the fundamental premise stays unchanged. Unlike the various production explanations such as the Judeo-Christian, Australian Aborigine, Sumerian, Navaho and so forth and so on. Where is the proof for them? Yes, we will recognize. That is what hundreds of thousands of scientists all over the world do with their lives. They work and be trained biology and different sciences, and so they do it high-quality if they aren't encumbered via having to include faith of their work or teachings. Due to the fact that, frankly, Creationism in any of its guises, is a millstone to scientific success. It just encourages active lack of knowledge, and the education of these going by means of institution now will handiest suffer given that of it. . .
carl
2012-08-19 16:10:36 UTC
It is not wrong to accept evolution as a Catholic. Evolution is a scientific theory. There is evidence for it. It can also be disproved if evidence found disproves it.



I heard this analogy that I like. Have you ever played pool? When you hit a ball and bounce it against the side it always bounces away at the same angle that it hit it. So for instance if it hit the side at a 30 degree angle it will bounce away at that angle. This is a cold fact of physics. It doesn't require God's intervention. There is no god of the bounce.



Now we can look at evolution the same way. Evolution is like a cold physical process like the bounce. There is no god of evolution required. Now, if we return to our pool table we see that to an amateur a game of pool may seem very random, but to someone who is like a genious pool shark he knows just how to hit the balls so that they will do what he wants them to do. To an amateur it may appear that the pool shark is very very lucky. For all of his balls go in. What the amateur doesn't know is that the pool shark knows the law of the bounce and uses that to his advantage.



Again we can apply this to evolution. God is like the genious pool shark who knows the physical laws (because he authored them) and uses them to his advantage. Evolution then is like a bounce off the pool table. It seems cold and random to us but to the super intellect of the creator it is used to create the desired effect.



For evidence of God found in science see this excellent video from a Catholic priest and metaphysicist



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYRES03iylA&feature=related
?
2012-08-19 15:22:33 UTC
You can't be very active in your religion if you don't know that for many years now the CC has said it's okay to accept evolution, just as long as you believe it was authored by God and you believe in the resurrection of the body.
Brigalow Bloke
2012-08-19 15:43:37 UTC
The founder of Protestantism, Martin Luther used the idea of "sola scripture" which was, crudely put, the idea that everything in the Bible was literally true.



1200 years before that, the man who, apart from Jesus, founded Christianity as we know it today was Augustine of Hippo. He wrote about the year 400 that not everything in the Bible was to be taken literally because even then it was clear that some of it was not literally true.



We often hear that the idea of a Sun centred solar system was rejected by the Roman Catholic church, house arrest of Galileo and all that. But in it's early stages as worked out by Copernicus the idea was read before the pope who conditionally accepted it. Later, the Catholic church rejected it. But Luther had rejected first it because the Bible says in a few places that the Earth does not move. By the early 1700s though the RC church had finally accepted the idea because the evidence was so strong.



I do not know how long it took the more fundamentalist Protestants to accept that the Earth moved, but I suspect that Luther's rejection did not last very long. There are still some Protestants today who insist that the Earth does not move. They are very few though.



The anti-evolution crowd are in something the same boat as Luther was, but they lack the learning that Luther had. In my estimation 99% of young Earth creationists are people of slight education. They are led by a few hundred liars and frauds who are parasites on religion. These people are lying and they know they are lying, but it brings the money in from the 99% who believe them.



Do not confuse that sort of "Christianity" with the real thing.
?
2012-08-19 16:16:50 UTC
Most Catholic Christians do believe in evolution. But not the Darwin theory. We did not come from apes.



As a Catholic Christian I believe that God created the universe, the first plants and trees, the first animals and the first humans and then everything evolved from there. God is also the creator of evolution.

How else do you think we have so many species of plants and animals and humans. Everything had a common ancestor. Such as dogs,their common ancestor was a wolf,or cats, their common ancestor was a lion, and humans our common ancestor was Adam. Think about it





Catholic Christian †
2012-08-19 15:36:36 UTC
I am Roman Catholic too. The Roman Catholic Church DOES NOT utilize the "historical-grammatical" method of interpreting the Bible THROUGH and THROUGH the way Fundamentalist Protestants do. Usually Fundamentalist Protestantism assigns one meaning and one meaning ONLY to what Scripture speaks of, whereas Catholics and other Protestants derive more than one meaning out of Scripture. Historical-grammatical interpretation means that the Bible is taken to be quite plain it what it says and is therefore "non-interpretive".
?
2012-08-19 15:21:08 UTC
i don't think that's wrong.

sounds like you're mostly on the right track, i would say calling the bible a good book of fables & philosophy is accurate...i read it.

what i'm not sure about is how you identify as a catholic.

i constantly meet people who say they're "catholic but not practicing"...what does that mean??

it's not an ethnic group like the Jews.

and if you only believe Some of the teachings, you're not exactly catholic, am i wrong?



i also take issue with "respect everyone". no! i will be tolerant of everyone...except the intolerant.

i'm not going to respect hitler or bush or any of their followers.
?
2012-08-19 15:29:11 UTC
Excellent question! If you have read some Middle Ages Church history, you will find that indulging in things that are outside of the church is a negative thing (back then, the consequences were pretty huge). Evolution, free scientific thought, and others came about as a result of new thinking caused by the Protestant Reformation (Rome hated them).
2012-08-19 15:19:30 UTC
Because Atheists believe in Evolution Monkey Rocks.
2012-08-19 16:30:26 UTC
it is not wrong , the church teaches that god created all at the beginning , from then on nature took its course . look at the human family over the years, the racial colours especially, the different breeds of dogs and cats .
Ashley A
2012-08-19 15:18:27 UTC
I think basically because everyone is under the impression that god created everything perfectly and it doesn't need altering.
2012-08-19 15:20:46 UTC
Tell me: Do you believe in original sin? Where did that come from if evolution happened?
2012-08-19 15:15:53 UTC
Nice novel.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...