Question:
Why do some Christians use terms like "evidence" and "proof" when it's obvious they don't care to apply the relevant concepts in their own lives?
?
2015-09-29 01:05:11 UTC
And why do they ask questions about interesting scientific theories (like evolutionary theory, cosmology and astrophysics) as though they are genuinely interested in them when it's obvious they don't care at all about the scientific method and process of scientific investigation in general?

It seems to me in my humble opinion that they are just trying to "talk science" and use words like "evidence" and "proof" because they presume that it makes them appear somewhat intelligent.

But I do wonder whether they should just give up trying to appear as rational human beings in general?
Thirteen answers:
Annsan_In_Him
2015-09-29 01:12:35 UTC
Look, if you're going to express an opinion on here, don't pretend it's "humble".

Second, if you are going to keep repeating those charges (some of which I have already answered) yet failing to study books written by scientists who are also Christians - explaining the scientific method in relation to faith - then you are proving to the community that you don't really want answers at all.

You just want to use this forum to deny that there is any evidence or proof for faith in God.



For the last time, read this book below, then come up with some fresh questions, thank you.
?
2015-09-29 01:12:08 UTC
I think in some cases it's a point of definition. While science looks for empirical evidence, religious evidence is not considered in the light of empiricism. For example, look at how many times we've seen a religious verse or text, or the "perfection" of the universe, or (sadly, in some cases) a tree as "evidence" of a deity.



Seems to me we're coming at the concept of evidence from different directions and with completely different understanding of the word.
Ricardo
2015-09-29 06:22:02 UTC
Why do some Christians use terms like "evidence" and "proof" when it's obvious they don't care to apply the relevant concepts in their own lives?



- They consider their hallucinations as evidence.



when it's obvious they don't care at all about the scientific method and process of scientific investigation in general?



- They have fundie regurgitation's they think are intelligent, and have no awareness how absurd they are.



just trying to "talk science" and use words like "evidence" and "proof" because they presume that it makes them appear somewhat intelligent.



- Some idiot that they "believe" used them so they regurgitate them and think themselves intelligent.
melisa
2015-09-29 01:33:27 UTC
We have plenty of evidence from all the revelations people have and encounters with the other side. We have proof from our own lives and answered prayers. Christianity is a humble persons religion, proud people can't understand it.
Nous
2015-09-29 05:06:24 UTC
To try and hide the truth!



The first person to produce a single tiny little piece of verifiable evidence for any god will become world famous and mega rich!



Academia states that in the absence of any sort of evidence of the existence of something it must be deemed not to exist until verifiable evidence is found - thus god is held not to exist pending some sort of verifiable evidence.



The bible is what is called "Faction” A fictional story set in a factual time and place. Thus the time, place and real historical characters are all correct but the fictional characters and stories are not!



There is not one single mention of Jesus in the entire Roman record - that is right - not one! At the same time as he was supposed to have been around there were a number of Jews claiming to be the messiah - all of whom are well recorded!



There is not a single contemporary record from any source and even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!



He was supposed to have been a huge problem to the Romans and produced wonderful miracles but still not one contemporary record?



Even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!



Pilate is recorded in the Roman record as a somewhat lack luster man but no mention of a Jesus, a trial or crucifixion that would surely have been used to make him look brighter!



At best he was an amalgam of those others but almost certainly never existed!



Not one word of it is contemporary with the period and was not written until several hundred years after the period the story is set in!! How did the apostles write their books more than a hundred years after they would have been dead?



Christianity is an invention of the Italians and that is why it came from the Holy ROMAN Catholic church!



Please realize that those claims for the Old historians are worthless since they were not even born until long after everyone in the stories would have been so long dead!



Josephus AD 37 – AD 100

Tacitus AD 56 – AD 120

Suetonius - 69 – 130 AD

Pliny the Younger, 61 AD – 112 AD

Justin Martyr (Saint Justin) AD103–165 AD

Lucian - AD 120 -180 AD but he was hostile to Christianity and openly mocked it.

Pamphilius AD 240-309 AD

Eusebius AD 263 – 339 AD

Photius AD 877 – 886 AD



Thallus - But there are no actual record of him except a fragment of writing which mentions the sack of Troy [109 BC] Showing that he was clearly not alive in biblical times.



Some even try to use Seneca. 4 BCE – 65 CE but as a Stoic Philosopher he opposed religion yet made not a single mention of a Jesus or Christianity!



Even funnier is trying to claim Celsus AD ? – 177 AD Who said that Jesus was a Jew who’se mother was a poor Jewish girl whose husband, who was a carpenter, drove her away because of her adultery with a Roman soldier named Panthera. She gave birth to an illegitimate child named Jesus. In Egypt, Jesus became learned in sorcery and upon his return presented himself as a god.
2015-09-29 02:47:07 UTC
My question? Why do you Rant so much against Christianity?

Are you convicted you're wrong? Or have you met pretending Christians who tricked you? Did you buy into their untruth and now Rail?

You are humanist...so revere scienTISTS...science comes from biased SCIENTISTS...

Not everyone is into science...and what do YOU call science?

There are man sciences. I took many but many more and higher levels than I took. And I went to graduate level. But still...more.

I find it fascinating, designed my own experiments.

But science is LOW...LEVEL, EARTHY, COMPARED to Jesus.

Jesus is always interesting.
Cath.Ian
2015-09-29 07:34:00 UTC
Speaking as a Christian and a scientist you can, as far as I am concerned, stick your opinion where the sun don't shine. (Somewhere around the Cosmic Dawn)
Arakh
2015-09-29 01:13:00 UTC
There is evidence proving that Atheist is the real religion and we should all be.
User
2015-09-29 02:45:44 UTC
The question makes it apparent that you, yourself, do not know the meanings of those words.

Quite revealing.
2015-09-29 01:09:15 UTC
no evidence or proof that Atheism is true or the correct belief to hold
2015-09-29 01:11:10 UTC
How do you qualify someone to be a true Christian? Otherwise it appears your question to be a strawman.
Johnny
2015-09-29 03:45:29 UTC
You answered the question yourself. I agree.
nameless
2015-09-29 03:24:42 UTC
The monkeys are so cuddly,... but they bite!


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...